RTE RADIO 1. Below is an interview on the radio from today, enjoy. Thank you to Agostina for the heads up.
Category: Press
I’ve added 4 photos to the gallery UHQ/Untagged of Sebastian at Golden Globes Celebrating 2024 BFI London Film Festival at Soho Mews House Mayfair that took place today. More will be posted ASAP if/when available in AM.
Screen Captures > Web Videos > 2024 > ‘The Apprentice’ Press Tour > OutNow
I’ve added 28 photos to the gallery UHQ/Untagged of Sebastian at “The Apprentice” Green Carpet – 20th Zurich Film Festival that took place yesterday. There’s also a green carpet interview and screen captures below.
Screen Captures > Web Videos > 2024 > ‘The Apprentice’ Press Tour > Zurich Green Carpet
Sebastian Stan was “losing sleep” over not resembling Donald Trump physically.
“This was always a problem. Everyone has been saying to me: ‘You don’t look like him.’ You’ve already seen so much of him, so I thought it would be better to go ‘less is more’. But we still had to find the right hair and make-up people,” he said at Zurich Film Festival.
“When we started the film, we had a prosthetic test and it really didn’t look like him at all. I was very worried about that – we all were. Then fortunately I called the team who helped me with [portraying] Tommy Lee on ‘Pam & Tommy.’ We were able to find the right balance.”
Since its Cannes premiere, Ali Abbasi’s “The Apprentice” has been sparking controversy due to a scene which shows Trump sexually assaulting his then-wife, Ivana.
“You have to look at your feelings towards something you’re about to do and you have to be very diligent, strict and honest with yourself. Which of them are going to work for you and which are going to work against you? The ones that are going to work against you, you have to discard in order to serve the story,” said Stan about the violent sequence.
“It’s interesting to listen to Ali talk about that scene, because he goes: ‘Why is it controversial?!’ You can’t ignore [Ivana’s divorce] deposition, when she went on record to explain it graphically. Then she retracted it. Screenwriters had to decide what’s closer to the truth and maybe speaking under oath is closer to the truth. You can’t tell this story without including that part of their relationship and that part of his character.”
When he first read the script, written by Gabriel Sherman and depicting Trump’s friendship with infamous attorney Roy Cohn, Stan went as far as “crossing out the names of the characters.”
“I had very strong feelings about it. Then I did this game with myself and I could see a little bit clearer once I removed that big stain from the windshield. There was a story there about someone who started out a certain way, had very specific ideas and dreams, fears, insecurities and family issues, and then something happened. The man, to me, lost the person he was.”
He added: “It seems to me that [in Trump’s case] the need for power and control is so deep it overpowers any other need. I think we are talking about someone who has made the decision that ‘No one will ever have more power than me, ever again.’ You have to ask yourself if a person like that can really make the right decisions. If you are calling yourself the leader of the free world, we have a right to question that.”
As the team kept on working, trying to explore the very idea of the “American Dream” and the hero complex, said Stan – “This obsession with being all you can be, being the best of the best at everything” – Ali Abbasi’s unique perspective turned into an asset.
“He’s not American and doesn’t play for any team. I thought: If anyone has anything to say that we’re not thinking of, being so deep in it, it’s probably someone not from America.”
He also opened up about working with Jeremy Strong, cast as Cohn.
“Roy Cohn was the devil. A lot of people say that,” he noted.
“I’ve always admired [Jeremy] because I felt he cares. Everyone says they care, but they do only as long as it serves their interest. We met a month and a half before shooting: I was trying to gain weight and he was losing it. He said: ‘Do you want to eat anything?’ ‘Yes, I’ll have a burger with fries.’ He replied: ‘I’ll order a cocktail.’ I said: ‘I don’t drink now, he doesn’t.’ He said: ‘Yeah, but he drinks with me in the movie,’” laughed Stan.
“I didn’t really see Jeremy out of character. We would only meet on set, as Roy and Donald. There was no time for dinners or hanging out, or anything like that. I think it helped.”
Playing someone “everyone feels very strongly about and we can’t escape” was especially difficult, but playing a real-life person is a “technical process similar to learning how to play an instrument,” said the actor.
“You are sitting there, every day, for a number of hours. It’s slow and tiresome and annoying, and then you get faster [at it]. You know what the goal is, you just have to get there somehow. I always think of ‘Apollo 13,’” he said, recalling the “putting a square peg in a round hole” scene. “You have to figure out how to fit into it even though you’re not that.”
While “The Apprentice” is very much on his mind, Stan also discussed his role as Bucky Barnes in the Marvel universe.
“Action movies are really fucking hard. I think they don’t get enough recognition. Tom Cruise is not a normal person, right? I don’t know how he’s doing what he’s doing. I’ve never thought I’ll get to play the same role for 15 years. It’s weird – it’s almost like having a second life. He’s evolving as I am, hopefully, in life.”
He’s always happy to hear from Marvel.
“It’s like Christmas morning when the call comes. Santa Claus still lives. We’ve been trying to find new things with [Bucky] and Marvel allowed that. It’s not like now, he’s a good guy and morally invincible. He always has to deal with what he’s done. That’s relatable. That’s all of us.”
Stan came a long way since leaving Romania and later Austria as a child. “I would always do impressions, so my mum thought: ‘He should try doing this.’ She took me to this open call for [Michael Haneke’s] ‘71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance’ and I remember hating it.”
It wasn’t until coming across a “basement full of VHS tapes” in the U.S. and going to an acting camp “after years of wanting to be an astronaut” that things changed, leading to collaborations with such filmmakers as Ridley Scott, Darren Aronofsky or Soderbergh.
“When you get a little more successful, they respond. I’ve been very aggressive about it. I’m okay with saying: ‘I would really like to work with you.’ Sometimes it’s okay to let people know,” he laughed.
Stan recently starred in “A Different Man,” scoring an award at Berlinale – “An important step in my journey” – but as proven in Zurich, some fans never forgot his earlier roles either, including a lengthy stint on “Gossip Girl” as a troublemaking heartthrob.
“Some people never do. I still get it sometimes when I’m getting a coffee and someone whispers: ‘Carter Baizen.’ It’s like ‘Fight Club’ or something.”
Known worldwide as Bucky Barnes in seven (soon eight!) Marvel pictures, Sebastian Stan wowed festival audiences by showcasing himself as one of this year’s most intriguing, noteworthy character actors. First in Aaron Schimberg’s stirring A Different Man, and now as one of the most recognized faces on the planet, Donald J. Trump in the provocative upcoming biopic, The Apprentice. The movie also stars Maria Bakalova as Ivana Trump and Martin Donovan as Fred Trump.
From director Ali Abbasi (Border) comes The Apprentice. The fantastic movie is a grounded, gritty exploration of the corrosive and unpredictable relationship of infamous McCarthy-era prosecutor Roy Cohn (Jeremy Strong) and Trump. During this interview, Stan sat with Collider’s Steve Weintraub to discuss the film’s acute punk rock feel, the moral grayness of Donald Trump and Roy Cohn, and the complexities of portraying such controversial figureheads. Steve also did his best to get some Marvel tea brewing for Stan’s dedicated Winter Soldier fanbase. Check out the full conversation in the transcript below.
THR -The ‘Apprentice’ actor and co-star Jeremy Strong explain why they think it’s a good thing the film is coming out ahead of the election.
It seems like a given that Sebastian Stan would have been warned against portraying controversial figure Donald Trump in The Apprentice, but one studio CEO went a step further in his caution.
During a conversation with The New York Times published ahead of the film’s release in theaters today, the actor shared what his family and friends said when he told them he was taking on the role and noted that he spoke to people before agreeing to it.
“Pretty sure my mom said, ‘At least you get to shave,’” Stan said. “But I asked a lot of people about it, actually. A CEO of a studio told me not to do it because I was going to alienate half the country, and a casting director, who I respect very much said, ‘We don’t need another Trump movie, you’re never going to get any applause for it.’” (Contrary to that casting director, Stan has already begun receiving Oscar buzz for playing the former president and current Republican presidential nominee.)
The A Different Man star also revealed that people asked him if he would be worried about his safety following the film’s release. “But for some reason every time somebody said, ‘Don’t do it,’ it made me want to do it more,” he admitted.
The Apprentice follows a young Donald Trump in 1970s New York as he tries to make a name for himself as the second son of a wealthy family. Then he meets cutthroat lawyer Roy Cohn, who sees him as “the perfect protégé,” who will do whatever it takes to win, according to the description.
Director Ali Abbasi explained that the film can be interpreted in different ways. It can be seen as the story of a man becoming “a monster,” or it could be more about “human tragedy,” if the people in the story hadn’t been so focused on winning and taking.
Jeremy Strong, who portrays Cohn in The Apprentice, told the Times he feels the film is “mandatory viewing for any sentient beings who care about what’s happening in this country” ahead of the presidential election next month.
“I think it offers vital insight, which could move the needle in a real way,” the Emmy-winning Succession star said. “In this moment where we’re surrounded by rhetoric of hate and divisiveness, I think art has a place and film has a place.”
Stan, for his part, noted that he worries that people are “desperate for answers and for guidance” and just want to be told how they should feel and what’s right and wrong.
“This whole discomfort with the film only reflects why it’s important: It isn’t just what you’re learning about Trump, it’s also what you’re learning about yourself from Trump,” he said. “I worry that we’re not going deeper anymore with how we approach things. We’re just reading Wikipedia pages. If that’s what you’re going to do, then you’ll just float among the rest of the ghosts of Christmas past. But the rest of us, at least, are going to try and get to the bottom of some things.”
Few movies this year have made as many headlines as “The Apprentice.”
Ali Abbasi’s film about a young Donald Trump ( Sebastian Stan ) under the tutelage of cutthroat attorney Roy Cohn ( Jeremy Strong ) has caused a stir at the Cannes Film Festival, been threatened with legal action by the Trump campaign and seen its chances for release dwindle before a distributor, Briarcliff Entertainment, was willing to put it into theaters.
Before “The Apprentice” arrives in theaters this weekend, The Associated Press spoke with Abbasi, Stan, Strong and screenwriter Gabe Sherman about how a very unlikely movie came together and how they hope it’s received in the runup to the November election.
Continue reading
About halfway through The Apprentice, Ali Abbasi’s divisive biopic about the early career of Donald Trump takes a jarring turn that will inevitably alienate some viewers. Up until this point, the plot has largely focused on the relationship between Sebastian Stan’s Trump and his mentor, notorious prosecutor Roy Cohn, whom Jeremy Strong plays as if Cohn invented the sinister gay trope (honestly, he might have). Written by Gabriel Sherman, The Apprentice dramatizes actual events, including the scene in question, when Trump sexually assaults his then-wife, Ivana Trump (Maria Bakalova). It’s an intensely unsettling scene that feels crucial to the film’s narrative structure and impact – clearly, I can’t stop thinking about it weeks later – but is it necessary?
Perhaps naively, I wasn’t expecting a graphic sexual assault scene in the middle of The Apprentice, but given the subject, I shouldn’t have been surprised. It happens about halfway through the movie, when Ivana attempts to recapture the intimacy in her marriage to Donald, whose insecurities have fully curdled into repulsive misogyny. Ivana gives her husband a self-help book about intimacy, and he rejects her, explaining that he’s no longer attracted to her at all. They get into a heated argument that turns physical, and Donald violently sexually assaults his wife. That description may seem redundant, but given that scenes of sexual assault have become less frequent in movies and TV, and the ones we do see are relatively tame, it’s apt.
Like almost everything else in The Apprentice, this scene is based on an actual event. Sherman, the film’s screenwriter and a professional journalist, told Entertainment Weekly that he had the script vetted by his lawyers in the hopes of avoiding the wrath of the notoriously litigious former president. “I submitted an annotated draft of the script to our lawyers that was point-by-point articulating where the information came from, and how I dramatized the scenes,” Sherman said. “So it was rigorously supported by the research.” The scene is based on a sworn deposition Ivana Trump gave during her divorce from Donald Trump, in which she described her husband’s attack as a “violent assault.”
Author Harry Hurt III covered the deposition and the alleged assault in his 1993 book The Lost Tycoon. In the lead up to its publishing date, Trump’s team released a conspicuous statement from the former Mrs. Trump in which she walked back her previous allegations:
“I wish to say that on one occasion during 1989, Mr Trump and I had marital relations in which he behaved very differently toward me than he had during our marriage. As a woman, I felt violated, as the love and tenderness which he normally exhibited toward me, was absent. I referred to this as a ‘rape,’ but I do not want my words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense.”
The Apprentice does interpret Ivana’s deposition in the literal sense, resulting in the most disturbing and controversial scene in the entire film (Roy Cohn’s collection of frogs notwithstanding).
As a young cinephile in my teens and twenties, I often defended similar scenes in movies and (to a lesser extent) television shows. Sexual assault is a vile, irrevocable act that leaves victims deeply traumatized and forever changed – and if it’s crucial to a character’s story, it seems disingenuous to gloss over it. If movies are meant to generate empathy, then shouldn’t sexual assault be shown as the heinous act that it is? Shouldn’t the filmmaker attempt to depict assault in such a way that elicits a proportionate reaction from the viewer? I’m less inclined to jump into the rape-scene discourse these days, and thankfully, there are fewer rape scenes to discourse about, but as someone who has experienced sexual assault, and who believes that movies – and art – are capable of generating empathy, I still get preoccupied by these questions.
In The Apprentice, the scene creates a line of demarcation; what was, for the previous hour, a black comedy about two horrible men, suddenly becomes a horror film. On a functional level, the scene is meant to rattle you, and it vigorously upends the unspoken covenant between the film and the viewer. We watch movies from a safe distance, taking comfort in the fact that what we’re seeing isn’t real, and it can’t hurt us. But there’s a meta quality to this scene and the latter half of The Apprentice, as we’re violently reminded that Donald Trump isn’t just a character or a political boogeyman – he’s real. And lest you forget, he’s not only been accused of sexual assault by more than 20 women, but in 2023, he was also found liable of sexually assaulting journalist E. Jean Carroll in 1996. Despite this (and his multiple indictments and criminal convictions), Trump is still on the ballot in November.
For these reasons alone, depicting the sexual assault of Ivana Trump feels imperative. It’s a pivotal scene that makes the second half of The Apprentice more impactful, transforming the film from a white-collar political fable into a visceral warning. And the scene is based on Ivana Trump’s sworn deposition; it wasn’t invented to up the narrative stakes. At the same time, the moment is so disturbing and so violent that, like many viewers, I can’t help but wonder if it could’ve been softened in the editing room – a question that seems almost ridiculous to ask about depicting a heinous act of gendered violence. Of course it should be horrible. It is horrible.
The Apprentice offers a vital reminder that behind the humorous verbal flubs and deranged all-caps tirades on social media, which we have so much fun ridiculing, there is a horrible man whose actions have human consequences. Again, I ask: Is that scene necessary? I don’t have a simple answer. But I do know that I haven’t stopped thinking about this movie since I saw it. If nothing else, it’s effective.
In Ali Abbasi’s “The Apprentice,” there is a scene where Donald Trump (played by Sebastian Stan) gets a hair transplant to remove a bald spot as well as liposuction to look slimmer.
The film follows Trump as he starts out as a local real estate developer in the 1970s to become a national celebrity in the 1980s. He learns the power game from Roy Cohn (Jeremy Strong), a ruthless and hedonistic political fixer. Hair department head Michelle Cote, along with prosthetics leads Sean Sansom and Brandi Boulet, were the artisans responsible for transforming Stan into Trump and helping to pull off the sequence.
As time passes, Trump starts to lose his hair and gain weight to the point where he’s popping amphetamines to help with his weight loss. But it doesn’t work.
Stan gained 15 pounds for the role to reflect Trump’s body transformation; the costume department also made a padded suit with a prosthetic belly. “Any of the scenes where his shirt was off or his robe was open, we’d put the fake piece on him,” says Boulet. The team used the prosthetic abdomen for a look they nicknamed “Pills Donny.”
“We had a fake belly that we made for Sebastian for part of his ‘Pills Donny’ look, which was my favorite one to do, because he was all red, blotchy, always eating and sweaty and a little disheveled,” Boulet explains.
Due to his hair loss and weight gain, in the film, Trump resorts to plastic surgery. For the hair transplant scene, Sansom reveals that they used “the top of a fake head with a scalp. Michelle had a toupee, and an area was cut away where the scalp would be removed. The hair was punched in one hair at a time, and the piece was rigged with a bloodline, and the scalpel had a bloodline on it too — and it was shot in one day.”
When audiences are first introduced to Trump, he’s much younger, so Boulet used prosthetic lift pieces on Stan’s face. “We pulled his cheeks and eyes up and tightened his face to make him look younger,” Boulet explains, adding that “for skin tone, we had him a bit lighter than the classic orange that you see at the end.”
Cote even gave Stan a blonder wig with medium sideburns for that early phase of Trump. But it was an evolving look, with his eyebrows, hair and skin tone all changing as time passed. “When he’s younger, his hair was golden because he was outside more and had some natural highlights,” Cote explains. “As he got older, he lost his highlights and [his hair] became darker.”
To capture Trump aging, Boulet would lower Stan’s lift pieces. Cheek plumpers were then added to “bury” the actor’s chiseled face and defined cheekbones. “He had an upper dental plate that didn’t cover his teeth. They were lumps under his lips that pushed the [mouth] area out more so that it was flatter,” Samson explains. “And they were put into his lower lip to give him that Donald look from the nose down.”
One challenge that the team had to navigate was Stan’s facial hair. With day-long shoots, Stan’s facial hair would start to emerge, which meant constant touchups were necessary. “He’s got a five o’clock shadow the minute he starts shaving. So, we had to work with little things like that where we’d have to cover it and blend the prosthetic.”
Makeup artist Colin Penman recalls being captivated while watching the monitor when Stan and Maria Bakalova, who plays Ivana Trump, recreated the 1988 Oprah Winfrey interview. “I knew we had something because there’s this fine line where we don’t want to do a parody. We want it to be real,” he says.
In addition to his weight gain, Stan came fully prepared to play and capture the essence of the former president. “Production had put aside a large file of reference videos and photos that everyone was using,” says Sansom. “We were trying to recreate and reproduce some of the photos as best as we could.”
Boulet adds, “Sebastian had everything. His phone was full of research. He’d come in the morning and would be studying and watching videos.”